Ah yes, Juliet Starling. Because what the chainsaw-wielding cheerleader genre really needed was to be reduced to a clickable cumdumpster. This isn't some edgy parody, it's a looped animation pad that probably took less effort than licking the stamps for a cease and desist letter from Suda51. The art style tries to capture that Lollipop Chainsaw vibe, but it's like looking at a blurred photocopy of a screenshot that's been left out in the sun.

You get a grid of numbers, and each one is a different angle of the same brutalist philosophy. Click '1' and Blondie is getting her throat rearranged. Click '2' and it's the other zombie from a slightly different angle. The 'threesome' is the big selling point, but it's just a mechanical procession towards the inevitable cumshot, which you can direct to her face, mouth, or, groundbreakingly, inside her. The loops themselves are the kind of jittery, robotic motion that makes you wonder if the zombies are just as bored as you are. I mean, the sound design is probably just a wet sock slapping against a keyboard.

And that uniform. It stays mostly on, which is a choice. It's like the artist was terrified of drawing actual anatomy, so they just drew the costume first and added some balloon-like flesh around the edges. The whole thing has the energy of a Newgrounds submission from 2005 that everyone forgot about for a very good reason. There's no build-up, no tease, just a menu of holes to fill. Honestly, I've seen more erotic tension in a medical diagram. It's a fap simulator with the user interface of a microwave. Press number, get splooge. You can't even call it a game. It's a utilitarian smut dispenser with all the charm of a broken vending machine. The debate here isn't about taste, it's about whether clicking a 'cum inside' button constitutes a 'different animation' or just a palette swap for the last half-second. I'm leaning towards palette swap.