Right, so I'm supposed to be some ethics watchdog type, yeah? Talking about consent in a game where you play a literal incubus. The whole premise is your guy has this overwhelming urge to impregnate any woman he finds in the night city. It's not exactly a subtle starting point for a discussion on virtual character agency, is it? The game uses real model photos, which makes the whole domination angle feel a bit more... pointed. It's not a drawing you're manipulating, it's a photograph of a person, even if they were paid to be in this.

There's this one scene, early on, where you corner a woman in an alley. The choice system is there, you can pick a "charm" option or a "force" option. I picked charm, and the text described her initial fear melting into a kind of dazed compliance. It was like watching a nature documentary where the narrator describes the gazelle just... giving up before the lion even pounces. A weirdly poetic surrender. The whole thing is framed as this erotic quest, but the "choices" mostly feel like different flavors of the same inevitable outcome. You're chasing one goal, as the description says, and the women are just... objectives. The game doesn't even pretend otherwise.

The presentation is deliberately unpolished, which I guess is a choice. The interface is clunky, like a spreadsheet someone tried to make sexy. I spent five minutes just trying to figure out how to use an item I'd picked up, some kind of pheromone spray. Never did work it out. Maybe it was bugged. The whole thing runs in a browser, so it's not like you're expecting AAA polish, but the jank pulls you out of it. You're there, trying to be this dominant supernatural being, and you're fighting with a dropdown menu. It's a strange mix of a power fantasy and a tech support call. Does the incubus need to clear his cache? Probably.